Home | News | Contact | What's New | Site Map | Client Login

Facility Engineers


Keeping It Simple Saves Money

Although Consulting engineers contribute to energy savings when they specify the appropriate building automation system controls for your mechanical equipment, it’s skilled operating engineers who make deep, long-term savings a reality. Operating engineers wear many hats during the average week. They fix plumbing leaks, replace light bulbs, supervise contractors, conduct mechanical preventive maintenance, paint and do administration paperwork. And now, with the purchase of most building automation systems, operating engineers must be computer programmers, too.

Complicated Systems

Most building automation systems are more complicated and harder to use then they should be. Why? One reason is time to market. It takes time to simplify the use of software, and every manufacturer wants to be first to market. Another reason is return on investment. The more research and development dollars going into software, the more systems that must be sold to reap a profit. And still another, darker reason is that many manufacturers and installation contractors and most of their profit from changes, repairs, and maintenance after the initial installation cost. What would that revenue stream become if your building automation system was simple enough to handle in house? Savings.

Imagine if you wanted to calculate on your computer the average cost light bulbs on your last six orders. You could just use your computer’s built-in calculator function, or you could build a quick spreadsheet for future comparisons. Not a big deal, right? But, to make the calculation, let’s say you need to actually write a program in Basic or C++ programming language, or even worse, use a special language made just for your type of computer, then compile it and run it to get your average light bulb cost. This is what most operating engineers must do with many building automation systems if they want to do something with simple or as simple as averaging the temperature of two offices.

If you had to call a contract programmer every time you needed to compute your light bulb cost, you would just do it by hand. At least 50% of the companies I’ve called on are defeating their control systems by doing things manually, such as forcing valves open or disconnecting dampers. After operating this way, before ling your building automation system will turn into nothing more then a big time clock and your energy savings will tick away.

Powerful Yet Simple Systems

Don’t miss the boat on real long-term energy savings. Buy a powerful control system that your operating personnel do not have to learn a programming language to use. The simpler the system is to use, the greater the contribution operating engineers can make toward lowering energy cost on a daily basis.

A simple control system is less expensive to install, less expensive to learn how to use, less expensive to maintain and less expensive to refine or expand. A simple control system also has fewer hidden costs. The single most important factor governing energy savings produced by a building automation system is how easy it is to use.

You must take into consideration all cost savings not just energy saving when looking at the big picture of purchasing a control system for your energy management program. When you take all identifiable cost into consideration, don’t be surprised if the control system with the lowest initial purchase price is complicated, hard-to-use and requires a larger overall investment during its life.

Topologies
Multiple Building Networks
2_M_Bldg (JPG) 2_M_Bldg (Visio) Multiple building complex diagrammed to show all switches and controllers connected to in-house LAN.
6_M_Bldg (JPG)_ 6_M_Bldg (Visio) Three-building network using an existing fiber optic network.
Wireless Building Networks
1_W_Bldg (JPG) 1_W_Bldg (Visio) Illustrates the principles of a two-building wireless network.
89_W_Bldg (JPG) 89_W_Bldg (Visio) Three-building fiber optic network.
Single Building Networks
5_S_Bldg (JPG) 5_S_Bldg (Visio) Controller communications layout example that assumes network connection from a group of controllers to others.
12_S_Bldg (JPG) 12_S_Bldg (Visio) Diagrams a 24-story building utilizing Computrols 32x controllers.
See all topologies...